Clause 9 focuses on Performance Evaluation, providing updates to help organizations modernize their monitoring, measurement, and management review processes. The new draft introduces clearer language, emphasizes digital records, and aligns audit and review expectations with current business practices.

In this post, we’ll break down key updates under 9.1 Monitoring and Measurement, 9.2 Internal Audit, and 9.3 Management Review, showing what has changed and how to adapt your QMS effectively.

9.1 Monitoring, Measurement, Analysis, and Evaluation

9.1.1 General

The draft adds “as applicable” to the methods sentence, giving organizations flexibility in choosing evaluation methods. Documented information must now be “available as evidence” rather than “retained,” supporting digital recordkeeping. This aligns audit language with modern workflows and software-based systems.

9.1.2 Customer Satisfaction

ISO now explicitly includes complaints and social media as valid data sources. Organizations must consider these channels as part of customer satisfaction evaluation.

For users of our Web QMS software, tools like the Customer Satisfaction app captures complaints and compliments; and complaints integrate functionality for corrective actions with root cause analysis and review of effectiveness.

9.1.3 Analysis

The term “appropriate data” is replaced with “relevant data.” This subtle wording change emphasizes focusing on data that truly matters for performance evaluation rather than collecting what’s merely convenient.

9.2 Internal Audit

ISO adds titles to subclauses and separates the audit program from specific audit activities. Subclause 9.2.2 now includes “audit objectives” alongside criteria and scope, clarifying the purpose of each audit. Reporting language is refined to “relevant managers” for direct accountability.

As with other sections, internal audit records must be available as evidence, not necessarily retained. The ISO 19011 note clarifies guidance for auditing, ensuring consistency and modern compliance standards.

9.3 Management Review

Inputs

While most inputs remain the same, 9.3.2.c introduces a new requirement: include changes in needs and expectations of interested parties relevant to the QMS. This ensures your management review considers evolving stakeholder requirements.

Outputs / Results

ISO replaces “management review outputs” with “management review results,” making terminology clearer. The bulleted list of results is removed, emphasizing continual improvement opportunities rather than continuous improvements. This reflects realistic performance trends while reinforcing the need for actionable improvement.

Key Takeaways

Overall, the changes in Clause 9 are welcomed and will definitely enhance the value these requirements bring to any company.

In summary:

• Modernization: Customer satisfaction data now includes complaints and social media channels.
• Stronger Audit Expectations: Audit objectives are now explicit, and programs must consider organizational changes.
• Clearer Management Review: Inputs are structured, and improvement opportunities are highlighted explicitly.

Stay informed and begin planning early—well before the final standard is officially published. Sign up to receive a copy of our Comparison Analysis which contains a side by side comparison of the ISO 9001:2026 DIS versus the ISO 9001:2015 standard.